Back to Retinal Vein Occlusion and Diabetic Macular Oedema

Retinal Vein Occlusion and Diabetic Macular Oedema Research Pipeline

This page shows what publicly available data tells us about the current state of research into Retinal Vein Occlusion and Diabetic Macular Oedema, from NIH funding through to clinical trial activity. Data is sourced from public government registries and updated nightly.

Drugs shown in the research pipeline are not currently available as approved treatments unless separately listed under Drug Approvals. Pipeline data shows research in progress only. Always discuss current treatment options with your doctor.

NIH Total Funding

US$97.8M
Total NIH (United States) research funding tracked, in US dollars, not Australian dollars. Source: NIH Reporter.

Phase 3 Trials

9
Trials currently in Phase 3 (closest to regulatory approval). Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.

What the data suggests

AI generated pipeline summary. Written by an AI model from the official source data and checked on a sample basis. It can contain mistakes, so confirm anything important against the original source. How we use AI

According to NIH funding data, a moderate amount of public research funding has been directed toward Retinal Vein Occlusion and Diabetic Macular Oedema, which suggests these conditions have attracted meaningful scientific attention at a global level. However, the direction of that funding has been falling year on year, meaning the financial commitment from public sources appears to be declining rather than growing. For patients, this could mean that research momentum supported by government dollars may be slowing, though it does not tell us what private or industry-funded research may be underway alongside it.

Registry data shows activity across both early and late trial stages, which is an encouraging sign for patients. Early stage trials, such as Phase 1 and Phase 2, suggest researchers are still exploring new approaches, while later stage trials point to treatments that have already cleared initial safety and effectiveness hurdles and are being tested more rigorously. This spread of activity across the pipeline suggests the field has not stalled at a single point, and that some experimental options may be closer to broader availability than others.

For Australian patients, the picture around local access is currently unclear based on the data available. No TGA approval is recorded for treatments in this specific pipeline context, and no PBS listing status has been captured, meaning it is not possible to confirm from this data alone whether any pipeline treatments are approved or subsidised for use in Australia. Patients are encouraged to speak with their specialist about what options may already be available to them and whether any clinical trials are currently recruiting in Australia. This information is sourced from publicly available government registries and is updated regularly. Always discuss treatment options with your doctor.

Data sourced from NIH Reporter, ClinicalTrials.gov, openFDA, and other public government registries. Updated nightly. This page does not constitute medical advice. Pipeline signals are indicators based on publicly available data, not predictions of clinical outcomes or regulatory decisions.